Legal Question in Legal Ethics in India

My Information for your analysis wrt my illegal & enforced Retirement Date ignoring the position of Law on the Original Date of Birth Evidence submitted against an extant policy of date of birth-once entered cannot be altered on Record followed by a an Indian Nationalized Bank which since not allows audit & inspection & vigilance skills to work . Any request to reverse semi-legal dates such as submitted from the X-std-pass-book / College/ University Records known as the secondary sources for date of birth and accepted by the Bank / Recruitment Boards as such without cross-verification with the Registrar of Births/ Certificate of the Registrar issued from Birth Register known as the primary source by the permanent staff of the Bank gets rejected even if it causes either the Exchequer heavy losses of Income or the permanent employees loss of eligible service of career & growth in cases of differential dates detection either through prospective audit & inspection & vigilance skills departmentally or through personal appeals by permanent staff who are given power of attorney for conducting business of the Bank in the capacity as legal agents of the Bank .
Can one say the extant policy on date of birth --once entered can not be altered on Record followed by the Government of India Enterprise-- Bank , is an Unconscionable Conduct & an affront to the integrity of the judicial system that a Law Court with an appeal before it against the Bank will proscribe it ?
sd/- Dr. Rojukurthi Sudhakar Rao,
28-2-2014

Asked on 2/28/14, 8:57 am

0 users found helpful

0 attorneys agreed

01.03.2014

Dear Dr. Rajokurthi,

Yes, the date of birth once entered, if subsequently altered and amended is fraudulent.

Regards,

Answered on 2/28/14, 7:40 pm

Keywords

Match Any Match All

Country

State

Area of Law