Legal Question in Business Law in California

I am defendant in a limited civil case and plaintiff has already exhausted his discovery requests per the CCP 94 rule of 35. He is now submitting notice of deposition and requesting additional documents per CCP 2025.280; Is this allowed? It seems like it would be an end-run around CCP 94.


Asked on 12/30/15, 1:52 pm

3 Answers from Attorneys

Carl Starrett Law Offices of Carl H. Starrett II

What you describe is allowed under the law. CCP Section 94(b) allows the plaintiff to take a deposition and that is separate from the Rule of 35. CCP Section 94 does not limit the document requests that can be made for production at a deposition.

Read more
Answered on 12/30/15, 2:13 pm

The rule of 35 only exists to prevent a party from drowning another party in a bunch of written questions that have to be answered in writing, when the much more efficient methods of reviewing documents and taking oral depositions can be used to gather information. Therefore those methods are much less restricted and do not come under the rule of 35 in order to encourage their use as opposed to written interrogatories.

Read more
Answered on 12/30/15, 3:37 pm
Bryan Whipple Bryan R. R. Whipple, Attorney at Law

It's also possible to ask the court for permission to exceed 35 questions. Such permission is more or less routinely granted in complex unlimited civil cases, but I think a judge would be much less inclined to allow more than 35 questions in a limited civil case.

Read more
Answered on 12/30/15, 3:44 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Business Law questions and answers in California