Legal Question in Business Law in California

I want to leave my franchise and open my own similar business and want to know about non-compete and if I even have a valid franchise.

The franchise agreement I signed with "Puppy" expired two years ago. At the same time, The Master Franchise "Dog" sued "Puppy". Puppy filed bankruptcy and left. Since then, I have been paying my royalties to "Dog". "Dog" after two years still does not have a Uniform Franchise Offering Circular and I cannot sell my business, I'm not certain I own a franchise. They say they are working on it the FOC, but we get very little updates on it's progress other than "soon". My franchise agreement says that I cannot compete for two years after the termination or expiration of the franchise agreement and the non-compete area is in any location within the fifty (50) United States. What are my legal rights?


Asked on 8/14/14, 10:49 am

4 Answers from Attorneys

William Christian Rodi Pollock

No one is going to be able to advise you effectively without reviewing your contracts and the history you have summarized. You need to seek counsel to answer your questions, and provide them all of the relevant documents.

Read more
Answered on 8/14/14, 11:05 am
Paymon Bidari Bidari Civil Defense

As a general rule under California law, contracts that restrict or penalize competition among former employees and employers are void and unenforceable in California (Business and Professions Code section 16000, et seq.) The California Supreme Court examined the issue of whether or not there was a �narrow restraint� exception to this general rule, which would allow a contractual provision to be valid and enforceable when a party is �barred from pursuing only a small or limited part of the business, trade or profession.� The California Supreme Court held that there was no such exception to the unambiguous and undiluted language of Section 16600 and that any such restraints on an employee�s right to pursue his/her trade or business are invalid and unenforceable. (See Edwards v. Arthur Andersen (2008) 44 Cal.4th 937.)

Should you have any questions, or concerns, please call me at 714.525.5570.

Read more
Answered on 8/14/14, 11:19 am
Anthony Roach Law Office of Anthony A. Roach

Non competition clauses are different in franchise agreements than in normal employer employee arrangments.

There are special laws that govern franchises in California. This is known as the Franchise Investment Law. California Corporations Code section 31110 provides it is unlawful �to offer or sell any franchise in this state unless the offer of the franchise has been registered ... or exempted.� An offer or sale is made �in� California where �an offer to sell is made in this state, or an offer to buy is accepted in this state.� (Corp.Code � 31013.)

It is not clear what specific franchise you claim to have, but I suggest that you find out if it was even registered. You should also consult further with an attorney.

Read more
Answered on 8/15/14, 11:16 am
Terry A. Nelson Nelson & Lawless

You have a 'right' to consult with counsel, who will need to review all your contracts and other documents bearing on termination, non compete, etc. You have described a complex legal situation, and you want a 'snap' free uninformed answer from anonymous sources?? You are not going to get a legal opinion without going through that process. You should not be making important business decisions that could get you sued without knowing what you are doing, and what the risks, and your 'rights' are. Non compete clauses CAN be enforced if properly drawn under the rules. Most franchise contracts have such clauses.

If serious about hiring counsel to help in this, and if this is in SoCal, feel free to contact me. I�ll be happy to help fight and get the best outcome possible.

Read more
Answered on 8/15/14, 2:33 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Business Law questions and answers in California