California  |  Family Law

Legal Question

Asked on: 9/19/10, 2:12 am

My fiance walked out on me and the mortgage, she was not on the house but she left. She took the bed half the money in the bank account and the laptop computer which was $2200, we bought together, she took the kitchen table. I canceled the honeymoon and she wants half the money four months later. She left me in June and I just received the money from the canceled honeymoon and she wants half. The money did come out of our joint account but I had a $4500 tax return when we paid for the honeymoon in full. The honeymoon was around $4800. Is she entitled to this money? She walked away from a $200,000 mortgage without much notice. Maybe a couple weeks. The honeymoon was in my name and she was considered a guest and now she is threatening to sue me for half the canceled honeymoon money. If she could win could I counter sue for the laptop and the bed?

3 Answers


Answered on: 9/24/10, 8:42 am by Timothy McCormick

By not making it to the alter, you two have no clear cut legal rights that don't depend entirely on the details of each transaction. If she was not on title to the house and not a co-borrower on the mortgage, then that drops out of the picture. On everything else you're just going to have to go to small claims court and tell it to the judge.


Did you find this answer helpful?

0 Users found this answer helpful.

0 Attorneys agree with this answer.


Libris Solutions - Dispute Resolution Services 201 Spear St., Suite 1100 San Francisco, CA 94105

Other answers from this attorney

Answered on: 9/24/10, 9:42 am by Anthony Roach

I doubt she would be a borrower on the loan, if she was not on title. Institutional lenders don't like to have deeds of trust executed by less than all of the owners on record title.


Did you find this answer helpful?

0 Users found this answer helpful.

0 Attorneys agree with this answer.


Law Office of Anthony A. Roach 9909 Topanga Canyon, Ste.313 Chatsworth, CA 91311

Other answers from this attorney

Answered on: 9/24/10, 10:03 am by Gary R. White

She is not entitled to any of the refund unless her money went into the payment originally. Furthermore, anything she might be entitled to at this point would be subject to a set off against the value of the property she took when she left. (By the way it appears that you escaped this woman just in time).


Did you find this answer helpful?

0 Users found this answer helpful.

0 Attorneys agree with this answer.


Burton & White 1325 Howe Avenue, Suite 214 Sacramento, CA 95825

Other answers from this attorney

Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask an Attorney!

Get answers from the top Attorneys
Ask Question

81 Answers given in the last few hours.

86611 Active attorneys ready to answer your question

Search Past Answers:
  Advanced Search