Legal Question in Family Law in California
RE: Rule 5.125 of the California Rules of Court --
I, Petitioner, prepared forms for b, c 1.b - Returning paperwork through service, to Respondent's Attorney mailed 25 July 2014 ---- There has been no conferring through telephone call nor in person in regards to the order. It has been 27 Court days since the hearing on 17 July 2014----my question is, If I receive (by service) the Court Order that Respondent's Attorney would have submitted to the Court by now and the order is the "Original" order before I sent back my objections.......then what do I do to let the Court know that I did not "agree" to the "Original" Order by the Respondent's Attorney?
1 Answer from Attorneys
Your post is confusing. You should have objected to the proposed order. When you refer to original order, it sounds as though the court already signed an order. The proposed order is the term for the unsigned order prepared by one party that you are objecting to. If the other side will not meet and confer and work it out, then you need to follow the steps in part e of Rule 5.125.
If the court has signed an order that does not comply, you are going to have to file a motion.
Related Questions & Answers
Looking for something else?
10,200 active attorneys ready to answer your legal questions today.
Featured Attorneys
Earn additional revenue and grow your business.
