California  |  Civil Litigation

Legal Question

Asked on: 5/11/13, 8:34 pm

I used a "rental company" (and I use that term loosely because they do not actually assist in housing rentals at all; they're a scam company) without checking them out first. Even though my instincts repeatedly told me that things were fishy, I ignored the warning signs and went ahead with the company anyway. A few hours later, the bad feeling was still there and something seemed amiss, so I Yelped the company only to find one extremely negative review after the next, all claiming they had been ripped off.

The situation is that my husband was told to sign a document that he actually did not read. It pertained to a refund, stating that he was acknowledging receipt of three properties that fit our criteria. That had to do with a different document given us that my husband filled out; that contract read that if we were given at least three properties, then we were not due the full refund of $180 of the deposit but only $130.

Even though my husband signed off on the document stating that we did indeed receive the three properties that matched what we wanted, we didn't in actuality get three. We only got one. The other two did not fit the criteria; in fact, one was a completely false listing. We checked it out and the address to the so-called house was not real; it belonged to a cash advance business. We have proof of this as well.

So my question is, is this contract even valid considering my husband signed something that said he "agreed to the following," even though "the following" didn't even happen?

Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask an Attorney!

Get answers from the top Attorneys
Ask Question

115 Answers given in the last few hours.

8662 Active attorneys ready to answer your question

Search Past Answers:
  Advanced Search