Do I need to serve a 3 day notice of pay rent or quit, first on my tenants before having a process server serve the unlawful detainer on them, or, these notices can be given and served on my tenants at the same time?
My tenants who have signed a one year residential lease have repeatedly violated the term of the lease that requires them to pay the rent on first of the month. This has affected my ability to pay my mortgage on the house on time.
Although, I had an amendment to the lease signed with my tenants and extended the due date to twelfth of the month vs. first of the month and waived all the late fees, nevertheless, the tenants continue not to pay me my rent by the due date.
2 Answers from Attorneys
The three-day notice must be served first. Indeed, the UD complaint cannot even be filed without having served the notice and alleging that fact in the complaint.
I suggest you meet with a landord-side unlawful detainer lawyer for assistance. There are also some decent self-help books on the market. I would NOT however, do your very first unlawful detainer action on your own. They are not automatically granted, and the procedure must be followed strictly..
The three day notice must be served first, and the time period must expire, before you can file an unlawful detainer action.
Related Questions & Answers
Does a plaintiff have a good chance of winning a lawsuit against the defendant if... Asked 5/08/13, 8:18 pm in United States California General Civil Litigation
Hi, my name is Sarah. My sister and I got a shoplifting misdemeanor on our record a... Asked 5/08/13, 8:14 pm in United States California General Civil Litigation
All the major supermarkets in Calif ask their customers "how are you today'... Asked 5/06/13, 1:44 pm in United States California General Civil Litigation
I bought three sea dewz i cant get titles are my money back what can i do Asked 5/06/13, 10:49 am in United States California General Civil Litigation
In brief I've received court document for 10k judgement from collection attorney... Asked 5/05/13, 1:34 pm in United States California General Civil Litigation