Legal Question in Intellectual Property in California

Hello.. I need help checking a section of an agreement, if there are any loop-holes in it. In the below section paragraph 1, it is important that all grants for video, sound and still photography shot of Artist by Producer, is ONLY valid for material of this sort recorded between the mentioned dates. NO grants can be given to material recorded of Artist by Producer outside those dates, or for any material recorded by someone other than Producer at any time. Is this clear and defined in this draft? Or is it possible to ad a small text to make it clearer?

1. Appearance Release: For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Artist hereby irrevocably grants to Producer, including its assignees, successors, and licensees, all rights in and to the videotape and sound recording made of Artist by Producer while in [the name of a village] from June 18, 2014 to July 20, 2014 , for use in or in connection with the program referenced above (�Program�). The rights granted to Producer include the right to distribute, telecast, edit and otherwise exhibit and use such videotape or sound recording(s), as well as Artists name, voice, likeness, appearances, photograph(s), videotape, film clip(s), motion picture, news and/or television footage (including any bloopers or outtakes) featuring Artist, sound recordings, written and non-photographic materials of Artist or editorial comments concerning Artist (collectively referred to as �Recordings�), worldwide, in perpetuity, in all media whether now or hereafter known, and in connection with the marketing, advertising, promotion, publicity and other exploitation of the foregoing or the programming service on which the Program is exhibited.*


Asked on 5/22/14, 2:01 am

1 Answer from Attorneys

Frank Natoli Natoli-Legal, LLC

This is not the right forum to find actionable and specific legal advice. No responsible lawyer will advise on a contract in a vacuum. You should have the entire contract reviewed so you are certain it comports with your interests. If the transaction is not worth that expense and effort for you, you will have to take your chances.

I suggest that you consult with a lawyer in private and discuss your objectives in more detail. You can start by calling around to several for a free phone consultation, get some insights then pick the best fit to work with.

Kind regards,

Frank

www.LanternLegal.com

866-871-8655

[email protected]

DISCLAIMER: this is not intended to be specific legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. No attorney-client relationship is formed on the basis of this posting.

Read more
Answered on 5/22/14, 6:42 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Intellectual Property questions and answers in California