It depends on the analysis. Giving credit alone may not be enough. There is a controlling legal case based on the redistribution of news and what constitutes copyright violation and misappropriation of protected information. If you are genuinely interested in paying to obtain a written legal opinion on this subject, please contact my office.

Best,

Daniel Bakondi, Esq.

The Law Office of Daniel Bakondi

870 Market Street, Suite 1161

San Francisco CA 94102

www.danielbakondi.com

Daniel Bakondi, Esq. danielbakondi@yahoo.com 415-450-0424

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This communication may contain confidential information, privileged information, or attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient or received this message in error, any use or distribution of this message is strictly prohibited and unlawful. Please notify the sender immediately, and delete this message. No attorney-client nor confidential relationship is created through this communication. Nothing communicated or provided constitutes legal advice nor a legal opinion unless it so specifies and written agreement for attorney services has been entered into. Your issue may be time sensitive and may result in loss of rights if you do not act in time. Thank you.

The first answer you received is correct. The case he's referrinng to was one where Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion for the U.S. Supreme Court. Here's the case: Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991). You can either Google it or just go to Wikipedia which will give a fair rundown on the case.