Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California

I'm looking into an article I came across online regarding landlords charging "late fees: on rent as high as $50 a day per day that it is late. The article referenced "1671. Validity of Liquidated Damages Provisions " and used the case Orozco v. Casimiro that the appeals court said late fees were under Liquidated Damages. Am I interpreting this correctly that the "late fee" would then fall under "3302. Money Payable With Interest" and the amount the landlord is charging is illegal?

Asked on 9/24/13, 7:38 pm

1 Answer from Attorneys

Anthony Roach Law Office of Anthony A. Roach
0 users found helpful
0 attorneys agreed

Orozco v. Casimiro explains that a late fee that is not a reasonable liquidated damages anticipated by the parties, but rather a penalty, is void and invalid. I don't understand the rest or your question and am not familiar with the particulars of your situation to analyze whether your late fees are proper or improper. You should consult with an attorney in person.

Read more
Answered on 9/25/13, 8:10 am

Related Questions & Answers

More Real Estate and Real Property questions and answers in California

Looking for something else?

Get Free Legal Advice

88953 active attorneys ready to answer your legal questions today.

Real Estate and Real Property Legal Forms

Browse and download our attorney-prepared and up-to-date legal forms from $4.99

Find a Legal Form

Featured Attorneys

Anthony SmithLawSmithLee's Summit, MO
Rahul Manchanda, Esq.Manchanda Law Office PLLCNew York, NY
Glen AshmanAshman Law OfficeAtlanta, GA
Find An Attorney

Are you an Attorney?

Earn additional revenue and grow your business. Join LawGuru Now