District of Columbia  |  Insurance Law

Legal Question

Asked on: 4/08/09, 9:09 am

Malicious act by a third Party

A vehicle was taken on Rent by a person, who now is missing with the vehicle. The courts are awarding the insurance company to pay saying that a malicious act means he had an intent to rob the vehicle when to took it for Rent. As per the Insurance policy, the persons who rents the vehicle, or the driver,takes the place of the Insured, so how can the Insured rob his own vehicle. Is this an business loss or does the insurance company liable

1 Answer

Answered on: 4/08/09, 8:19 pm by Michael E. Hendrickson

Re: Malicious act by a third Party

Without reviewing the relevant provisions of this insurance policy and any court rulings which may have been made in the matter as well as the relevant facts related to the renting of this vehicle and the apparent subsequent abscondance of the renter with the vehicle, I simply couldn't say one way or the other.

Did you find this answer helpful?

0 Users found this answer helpful.

0 Attorneys agree with this answer.

Attorney & Counsellor at Law 211 North Union Street Suite 100 Alexandria, 22314

Other answers from this attorney

Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask an Attorney!

Get answers from the top Attorneys
Ask Question

125 Answers given in the last few hours.

8663 Active attorneys ready to answer your question

Search Past Answers:
  Advanced Search