Legal Question in Employment Law in India

Resigned from A Public Sector Bank at HQ, New Delhi in order to get relieved from BANK�s services after selection as Group �A� official in a Central University, applied through proper channel, the BANK�s Authorities compelled to deposit BOND amount ( Although there was not any BOND executed nor any Specific training expenditure incurred) of Rs. 5,00,000.00 (That was deposited UNDER PROTEST to join new job in specified time) in gross violation of BANK Guidelines, Fundamental Rights of Indian constitution, Natural law of justice, Various Acts and judgments of Honorable courts, Central Government guidelines or DPE Guidelines (Department of Public Enterprises guidelines:CHAPTER II PERSONNEL POLICIES(c) Service Matters 29.DPE/Guidelines/II(c)/29 Regarding Enforcement/transfer of bond in respect of employees of Public Enterprises/Undertaking who leave the services of one Undertaking to join another Undertaking/Government service; even without incurring any expenditure on providing any Technical or Scientific Training / existence of Legitimate BOND. Only for the sake of protecting themselves for not having performed their duties or covering their acts depicting dereliction of duties as per guidelines and their latent desire to function as the Supreme authority of the Bank.

To exert extra pressure to disallow acceptance of resignation in absence of deposit of Rs 5 Lac, Salary was stopped from disbursement, Sanctioned Leaves were rejected, Notices were slapped for disciplinary action by incompetent authority, in addition to several threats of spoiling career by imposing false allegations etc. whose sufficient documentary evidences are available. Further, following payments were stopped from payment on false grounds even when the matter was taken up with higher authorities of BANK including CMD & ED. Following are still pending even after passage of more than 18 months of resignation, and BANK has stopped responding letters:

1. 2 TA bills: For Rs 21518.00 & For Rs. 42500.00.

2. Reimbursement of Fee & incentive for notified education course for Rs 15000.00.

3. Rs. 5,00,000.00 deposited with BANK UNDER PROTEST in order to be able to join new employment in time, as no such BOND existed at the time of resignation.

4. Terminal Dues : Actual in Lacs, if calculated, such as

a. BANK�s contributions to PF with Interest.

b. SERVICE Gratuity (Service gratuity is in lieu of pension. Minimum service to earn pension is 10 years. The Govt. servant with less than 10 years qualifying service is entitled to service gratuity.)

c. PENSION, In lieu of b above (As either b or c should necessarily be paid.)

d. RETIREMENT Gratuity (A govt. servant who has completed five years qualifying service and has become eligible for service gratuity or pension is entitled to retirement gratuity)

Further,

I raised protest in writing under acknowledgment and demanded copy of the bond and did move RTI application, demanding copy of the bond, but to no avail and 2 RTI requests are under CIC considerations in Second appeal as the BANK has preferred to stick to delaying tactics. After resignation in feb�11, I have constantly been trying to take recourse from everybody, including GM & CMD of the BANK but they have now stopped to respond even. If 2-3 times, they have responded, its only when I wrote to Finance Ministry, DoPT, Deptt. Of public grievances etc. but that have been only routine erroneous response made so casually that now it seems they are not govt. officials at all. At times, in return, they have tried to continue with their threatening skills like efforts to malign my image in the new job. Even Union people have not been supportive to an outgoing official at all. The only fault is that I could not approach some experienced and competent lawyer/law firm as I was running short of deadline of joining new job and was not in a position to get back my resignation from BANK, as I had not anticipated this raw treatment from BANK where I served for 7 years. BANK had demanded the payment citing the bond, in writing. I did demand the copy of the bond in writing but BANK has been avoiding by hook or crook even when demanded through RTI. I kept requesting them to not insist for deposit of Rs 5 Lac as there was not any such BOND, and even BANK had accepted my resignation letter with clause that there was not any BOND as on date, with seal. And ultimately when BANK did not relent, given the fear of not being able to join new job by given time, I ultimately deposited the payment under protest. BANK has issued receipt mentioned the payment is received against bond but finally issued a letter after deposit that there is no provision of depost of BOND amount UNDER PROTEST. The summarized matter of the fact is that BANK had selected a few experienced employees to impart specialized training but a few officers, who were responsible for arranging such training, despite instructions, kept avoiding and did not organize the training because of their biases, that could have cost some amount to BANK. By that time, my outside employment came and I tendered my resignation which the senior manager(establishment ) accepted with her seal as she knew from records that there was no such BOND. Now, the officers feared that BANK will not leave them, as they on their own had defied the orders of arranging training and execute a BOND as per guidelines, they kept forwarding my resignation letter to competent authority with insistence of recovery of BOND though my resignation letter had the facts to the contrary, while at the same time they kept threatening me and exerting pressures resorting to all sort of tactics as stated already, just with the notion that if they recover the amount, they will not immediately face the music. They, going by my simple nature, thought that I would not be taking legal recourse, and if I took, that will take long years and by that time they will retire from the job. I know that I have sufficient documentary evidence and now I wish to not only get my dues back but at the same time, some hefty penalty on erring and lying officers be imposed and be paid to me as compensation. Though summarized version, but still I think, this will serve the purpose for further guidance. Please suggest,

1. Should I, being a government official, pursue the case in my own name or my wife who is not working?

2. Can I sue the BANK for Dues only or to teach them a lesson, I should claim for damages/ compensation as well?

3. How much will this cost as this act of BANK has left me financial devastated? To obviate, Can there be some arrangement/negotiation for payment of your fee as and when the case settles on a pre-determined formula?

4. Is there some law of limitation as I deposited the amount in Feb'11 UNDER PROTEST and have continuously been taking up the matter with BANK?

5. Can I sue the BANK from Patna or Delhi only?

Regards,

n.b.:

1. All the above are backed by sufficient documentary evidence in the form of letters issued by BANK, RTI responses, documents, electronic proofs.

2. The sufferer is basically from Patna (Bihar).


Asked on 11/21/12, 3:58 am

2 Answer from Attorneys

Rajiv Chandhok Ph: +919810050896 https://www.linkedin.com/in/rajiv-chandok-0827b733/

Ans 1 : Your wife has no locus, so you have to file it in your name. Being a Govt official does not matter at all.

Ans 2: For suing them, you need to file a suit for recovery and damages, which may involve high court fees. I advise that you file a writ petition in the High Court praying for refund of your dues and bond amount, reprimanding the erring officials, claiming damages for harrassment and mental agony . For damages refer to the following judgments:

a) Loonkaran Vs State of Maharashtra. b) 1999 mah LJ 529. c) AIR 1992 Cal 207. d) 2002 LW 590. e) LPA No.551/2011 Delhi High Court. f) ILR 1998 2 Del 1052

Ans 3: A writ filing along with expenses would cost you Rs. 55000/-. Rest of the Answer: No, Not Possible

Ans 4: There is no time limit for filing a writ petition.

Ans 5: You should not sue because you will have to pay high court Fees which would be taxing. File a writ in the High Court of Delhi as the Respondent is in Delhi.

Read more
Answered on 12/14/12, 6:36 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Labor and Employment Law questions and answers in India