Re: Immigration marriage fraud

The individual first had a child with their USC spouse, which would indicate a bona fide marriage as, even if for only a short period of time, it appears the relationship was that of husband and wife. Next, the case went through as a divorce, not an annulment, so proving immigration marriage fraud does not appear realistic, if that's what your question is. Next, she had another child with someone else and is getting child support. In child support cases, one's motive doesn't matter, if you have a child, you have a legal duty to support it, period.

Re: Immigration marriage fraud

The individual first had a child with their USC spouse, which would indicate a bona fide marriage as, even if for only a short period of time, it appears the relationship was that of husband and wife. Next, the case went through as a divorce, not an annulment, so proving immigration marriage fraud does not appear realistic, if that's what your question is. Next, she had another child with someone else and is getting child support. In child support cases, one's motive doesn't matter, if you have a child, you have a legal duty to support it, period.

Re: Immigration marriage fraud

The individual first had a child with their USC spouse, which would indicate a bona fide marriage as, even if for only a short period of time, it appears the relationship was that of husband and wife. Next, the case went through as a divorce, not an annulment, so proving immigration marriage fraud does not appear realistic, if that's what your question is. Next, she had another child with someone else and is getting child support. In child support cases, one's motive doesn't matter, if you have a child, you have a legal duty to support it, period.