Northwest Construction, Inc., made a contract with the state of Washington for highway contstruction. Part of the work was turned over under a subcontract to Yakima Asphalt Pacing Co. The contract required that the any claim be asserted within 180 day. Yakima brought an action for damages after the expiration of 190 days. The defense was that the claim was to late. Yakima replied that the action was brought within the time allowed by the statue of limitations and that the contractual limitations of 180 days was therefore not binding. Was Yakima correct?
Answered on: 4/05/12, 11:46 am by Edward Hoffman
This is a homework or exam question. You're going to have to get your answer the old-fashioned way -- by learning the material.
Did you find this answer helpful?
0 Users found this answer helpful.
0 Attorneys agree with this answer.
Law Offices of Edward A. Hoffman 11755 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1250 Los Angeles, CA 90025► Other answers from this attorney