A ship‟s master issues a clean bill of lading, for 200 crankshafts to be sent to Lisbon from The Brazil. Only 100 were loaded on board, however. The seller had not booked freight space in advance, but the master intended to load the goods, & thought he had done so. The bill of lading is indorsed over to the buyer. Under the sale contract property passes on payment, which occurs three days after indorsement, & independently of it. The buyer, expecting the delivery of 200 crankshafts in apparent good order & condition, presents the bill of lading upon the arrival of the goods, but refuses to pay the freight after discovering the true situation. Freight has not been prepaid. The seller has since gone bankrupt. Consider all possible actions by the buyer against the ship-owner & master & the possible liability, if any, of the buyer to pay the freight. Would your answer be different if the Hague Visby Rules applied?
1 Answer from Attorneys
This sounds like someone searching for a maritime law or customs law exam question. This is an abuse of the purpose of this website, and will be duly reported.
Related Questions & Answers
We are a US based company that exports dairy products. We are in a situation where... Asked 5/24/10, 8:25 am in United States Washington International Law
I am planning to marry an Egyptian man in the state of Washington. He is a student... Asked 12/09/09, 12:40 am in United States Washington International Law
This is kind of complicated but my husband(a US citizen) married a Romanian woman 2... Asked 12/05/09, 9:05 pm in United States Washington International Law
Internationall law/immigration I'm a permanent resident/GC holder and my nationality... Asked 5/04/09, 5:31 pm in United States Washington International Law
Ucc filing Can an individual, living in Washington State, placing funds ($1m) or... Asked 7/24/08, 3:06 pm in United States Washington International Law