Legal Question in Business Law in California

Bad Reference

My previous employer is giving me a bad reference. I held many job responsibilities in the office and they increased once he had terminated the other office employee. He had promised a raise in my compansation for the additional job responsibilities. However, I felt what he offered was very unreasonable and gave him many examples of why I should entitled for more. When I had done this he became very offended and began treating my with a grudge in the office. Seeing our work relationship deteriorating, I gave my 2 week notice along with an option for him to waive the final 2 weeks of employment. After going through the necessary steps to leave on good terms, my previous employer has not been giving me a favorable reference. After attending several interviews, I have been recently informed of the poor reference he has been providing me. I have always been a hard working and dedicated employee for all of my previous employers. I feel his behavior has been very unprofessional and I would like to explore what my options may be in this peticular situation. I look forward to your responce.


Asked on 6/24/04, 4:08 pm

2 Answers from Attorneys

Bryan Whipple Bryan R. R. Whipple, Attorney at Law

Re: Bad Reference

Giving a bad reference may be defamation; if done in writing it is called libel, and oral defamation is known as slander. Both are torts, and one can sue for damages or for an injunction.

However, winning a suit and getting a judgment for damages is not a slam dunk. For example, there are at least two defenses to a charge of defamation: truth and privilege.

Truth is always a defense in a defamation action, and nowadays the plaintiff is generally expected to prove the statements about her were false, rather than the defendant having to prove their truth--this flows from the free-speech protection of the First Amendment.

In addition, for public-policy reasons courts may allow what is called a 'conditional privilege' to a former employer in giving information to a prospective employer, particularly if the information is volunteered rather than given in response to a specific question. The reason such statements are privileged (protected against defamation suits) is that there is a proper social purpose for sharing employment history, credit information, etc. The privilege is conditional, however; it is lost if the statements are made maliciously or perhaps even with careless disregard for the truth.

So, the bottom line is that if the former employer was responsibly giving his views for a proper purpose, and you have little firm evidence of an improper motive such as malice, your chances of winning are relatively slim. On the other hand, if you have strong evidence (such as copies of refrence letters) and the former employer showed a malicious disregard for the truth, you have a really good chance of winning, perhaps even with punitive damages.

Read more
Answered on 6/24/04, 5:57 pm
Donald Holben Donald R. Holben & Associates, APC

Re: Bad Reference

You may certainly pursue an action for defamation if in fact you are being truly defamed and have been damage. You have requirement to prove defamation and must have evidence, not just feelings or words. Someone must testify for you or other written evidence must be presented in addition to your own. There may be a possible privilege if info provided is or may be true. Need to speak with you before we can properly analyze this. Even with best evidence, litigation is tough, costly and a gamble.

Read more
Answered on 6/25/04, 5:30 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Business Law questions and answers in California