Legal Question in Construction Law in California

Is a 26 line item list a contract

homeowner/C1/ (builder?) sees neighbor's home

landscaped by people directed by workman, no

business signs etc. Workman is CFO of budding

corporation working under INFORMAL sub-division

status from parent contractor on big project next

door(additional license not yet pulled). Owner and

workman enter into a 26 line item description of work to

be done having only signatures and date- no remedies,

deadlines, or representations of business. job to be

done as per plan. Problems arise:

1, tile and sealer owner selects fail. tile has green

spots and sealer flakes. workman strips and reseals at

his expense.

2. concrete flexes and tile cracks in various locations

which we repair

3. verbal changes disputed

What relationship is in effect? I believe the homeowner

is an owner builder with a C1. As such he chose the

tile,and sealer provided the plans, and should pay

additional for their repair

Or did he void the contract by consistenly calling for

more than was written, for example, to install fountain

means to seal the exterior porous rock with over $300

of penetrating sealer I know I need a sit down. Do you

have a S.D. attorney? damages 5-12k


Asked on 8/25/02, 6:46 pm

1 Answer from Attorneys

Bryan Whipple Bryan R. R. Whipple, Attorney at Law

Re: Is a 26 line item list a contract

Courts tend to take the view that if two parties are behaving toward one another as though they're in contract, there probably is a contract in there somewhere. Then the search is on for admissible and credible evidence of the contract's terms. Anything in writing may become part of the proof of the existence and terms of a contract.

To the extent that a contract's terms are unclear or incomplete, a court can supply certain missing terms from surrounding facts and circumstances. This is especially true with respect to remedies for breach, since judges feel that choosing and granting remedies is largely a judicial prerogative.

Another principle to keep in mind is that even if a contract does not exist, the homeowner may be required to pay the worker for benefits conferred by the worker's efforts.

Also, there is a scheme of statutes regarding home improvement contracts designed to keep homeowners and contractors from ripping each other off. The laws, which require some written evidence of a contract in most cases, are somewhat more protective of the homeowner, who is assumed to be more vulnerable to abuse than the contractor, but the laws cut both ways. In California, thee laws are in the Business and professions Code. See, e.g., B&P section 7159.

Your question tries to compress too many facts into too few words, so a more specific answer is not realistically possible. For example, by S.D. attorney, do you mean someone licensed to practice in South Dakota?

Read more
Answered on 8/25/02, 8:20 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Construction Law questions and answers in California