Legal Question in Landlord & Tenant Law in California

pets

we moved into a house,they advertised pets. We moved in a month later we got a pitbull, then they said no pets we allowed. they advertised a pet; there was nothing in the lease about no pets so they are amending the lease to say no pets now. they never gave us the original copy of the lease we signed when we moved in and now they are saying that they have gotten complaints on us, is this legal.


Asked on 7/02/09, 1:20 pm

1 Answer from Attorneys

David Gibbs The Gibbs Law Firm, APC

Re: pets

Its an interesting question. Are you month-to-month tenants, or do you have a term lease (more than month-to-month)? If you are month-to-month tenants, then they can change the terms of your tenancy on 30 days notice. That includes the pet clause, however, if you were led to believe that you could have a pet, then I would make the argument that your current pet is grandfathered.

Your problem, however, is this - if your lease did not specifically authorize, or your landlords did not later authorize that specific pitbull, there is a good chance you are going to lose this one. Most leases I have ever read do not allow tenants to have pitbulls or other "dangerous" breeds. There is just too much liability associated with those dogs. Yours might be the sweetest one in the world (and I am a dog lover, so I feel your pain), but the odds are really good that it will be a dangerous dog.

If your landlord won't let you keep him, you have two choices - either you can fight the eventual eviction on the basis that the landlord "implied" through their advertisement that your dog would be accepted, or you can move. I would suggest the later, however, you are going to have a difficult time finding a landlord who will accept a pitbull now that you have him. Contact a local real estate attorney to go over this in more detail - there are a lot of potential twists and turns to this matter.

*Due to the limitations of the LawGuru Forums, The Gibbs Law Firm, APC's (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided is general and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.

Read more
Answered on 7/02/09, 1:56 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Landlord & Tenants questions and answers in California