Legal Question in Legal Malpractice in California

reconsideration denied

I am pro se litgant in malpractice suit. One claim is that atty failed to seek damages for Bane Act civil rights violation when HOA issued written order not to contact AG, DA or other public agency and tell them about wrongdoing of board. My complaint stated continuing violation and was disallowed by court on basis it started over 2 years ago. My motion for reconsideration on other matters was timely but denied. Within 6 months I was advised that the of three discrete written violations of same civil rights 2 were within the 2 years and I filed a renewed motion for reconsideration within six months of previous motion. This was denied also on basis it should have been presented sooner, Now I am making a motion for new trial for various irregularities of court and advers party. ..How can I reinstitute the denied violation of free speech and right to petition government. This is necessary to establish that the trial within a t rial is was viable and damages should be awarded. There were 8 people that signed the cease and esist order and I signed it under threat that I would be terminated and evicted and the Board had the power to do that regardless of Corp Code 7341. My attorney requested rescission of this unlawful contract withou


Asked on 7/29/08, 10:52 am

2 Answers from Attorneys

Robert L. Bennett Law offices of Robert L. Bennett

Re: reconsideration denied

Why are you proceeding without an attorney in legal malpractice?

This is complex, and very hard to prove.

You need an expert in litigation, and I am not such an animal.

Call your local law library. Most will give advice on the phone.

L.A. law library is especially helpful, if you can get through, and have them return your calls promptly.

You really should hire a lawyer who specializes in this. You will almost certainly lose ny yourself.

Read more
Answered on 7/29/08, 12:03 pm
Michael Stone Law Offices of Michael B. Stone Toll Free 1-855-USE-MIKE

Re: reconsideration denied

Since you do not have an expert witness who will testify your former attorney committed malpractice, you will lose.

I assume you are suing only for the sick pleasure of watching your former attorney expend time and money on your meritless case, because that's all you are going to get.

Read more
Answered on 7/29/08, 1:35 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Legal Malpractice Law questions and answers in California