Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California

I am thinking about making an offer on a bank owned foreclosed property in Orange County California. The house has a tenant in it that has not paid the rent in quite some time and refuses to let anybody in the home to inspect it. The tenant's 10-year lease agreement with the original property owner is through 2016.

The bank, which owns the property, has the home on the market, but says the eviction of the tenant is up to the purchaser of the home.

The home is in a very nice neighborhood, and hopes are that it can be purchased at a good price compared to a standard sale in the same area.

I realize tenants have rights, but what are the rights of the perspective buyer in a situation like this? Does this sound like something that can be easily handled, or a mess so sticky I should run the other way?


Asked on 5/07/12, 12:42 pm

2 Answers from Attorneys

David Gibbs The Gibbs Law Firm, APC

The bank has the same rights as the former owner of the property with respect to this tenant and the home. They have the right to give the tenant reasonable notice of the need to gain access to and inspect the home. The tenant, conversely, has the right to stay in possession of the home, and enjoys the same tenant rights that he or she did prior to the foreclosure of the property under the Federal Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009. Buying the property with the tenant in place is a very large gamble - you are going to end up in an expensive, and timely battle with the tenant to get them out. Even though they have not been paying rent, the eviction may still be very difficult due to the foreclosure.

First, never buy a property without a thorough inspection - inside and out - of the property. If the tenant won't let you in, then the bank needs to take the necessary action to get you access to the property. Second, you need to evaluate all of the documents related to the lease to be sure it is valid and that the tenant actually is entitled to the protections of the 2009 Federal law. Finally, your rights as a buyer are limited to what the bank is willing to do for you. As a foreclosure, the bank doesn't have the same duties to disclose problems with the property, or make it available for you for inspection - you're out on your own when buying a foreclosed property from the bank. The property frankly sounds like a nightmare, and unless it is a tremendous deal, I wouldn't even consider making an offer.

*Due to the limitations of the LawGuru.com Forums, The Gibbs Law Firm, APC's (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. Further, information you provide to the Firm through this website is not confidential - it is available publicly to anyone visiting this website. The Firm shall have no obligation to keep the information you provide herein confidential in any context. The information provided herein by the Firm is general, and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence. As required by 11 U.S.C. �528, we must now disclose that, "We are a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code. Assistance we provide with respect to Debt Relief may involve bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code."

Read more
Answered on 5/07/12, 12:51 pm
Anthony Roach Law Office of Anthony A. Roach

The bank is full of horse manure. The tenant does not have any federal rights to live the property rent free.

Read more
Answered on 5/10/12, 4:59 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Real Estate and Real Property questions and answers in California