Legal Question in Landlord & Tenant Law in Colorado

Tenant Law

When my roommate and I moved out of our apartment after 2 years not onlyn was our 1100 deposit taken but we were billed for 250. We called thedenver housing authority who told us since they refused a walk through and didn't provide reciepts to send a 7 day demand letter they sent us to collections. We filed in small claims. we are not denying their was some minor damage to the carpet but they refused a walk through, didn't proved reciepts and charged us for things that were already paid (the water bill) and what they sent to the collections dept. reciepts and pictures weren't for our apartment. and now one day before the trial their attorney has offered us 300 and told us that we can't win and if we don't settle it won't be taken off our credit report. We are now doubting our case. should we go to court?


Asked on 3/20/08, 7:01 pm

1 Answer from Attorneys

Robert Murillo Pivotal Legal Ltd.

Re: Tenant Law

It is impossible to tell you how good your case is based on only these facts. Did you take pictures? Do you have witnesses to the extent of damages? Are those other witnesses going to the trial? How old was the carpet when you moved in? Did you take pictures then?

The $1350 was for what exactly? Was that the cost to replace the entire carpet only or carpet and other issues? Did they provide a statement of what was being kept within 60 days (or earlier in the lease)? Under Colorado law they do not need to provide you with the invoices and the like, they just need a statement.

The basic rule is that the landlord cannot bill you for normal wear and tear. So, as for this carpet, if it was let's say 6 years old when you moved in, you lived there for 2 years, it would be hard for them to justifiably claim that you should be liable for the entire cost of the carpet even you did so much damage to render it unusable because after your leaving it had, approximately, 2 years of useful life at most remaining (most carpets have between 5-15 year useful life). So the reasonable cost in that circumstance (assuming that it was so damaged) would be 20% of 1350 or $270. I would doubt that this carpet was so high end that it was 15 years, but who knows). If it was a brand new carpet, the damage would have had to be extensive.

You really need to review these issues because I don't think you have reviewed case law or understand the best way to proceed and without this information your case is considerably less forceful to the judge. You should have done this review weeks ago. Good luck in your case.

Read more
Answered on 3/20/08, 7:30 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Landlord & Tenants questions and answers in Colorado