Motion to Supress Statements
How likely are written statements are to be suppressed in a felony matter. And can the statements of other co-defendants be used against you. What kinds of arguments goes on in a Motion to Suppress Statements hearing and what can a lawyer argue.
There were 3 defendants in the case. 2 of the defendants were arrested in another town but the same county without a arrest warrant in the town where the alleged crime took place. As a result of that arrest a statement by one of the defendants was given to where the stolen merchandise was located before he was merandized. The police from the other jurisdiction went to the defendants yard, without the owners permission and confiscated the merchandise.
At the police station they were merandized and signed a statement acknowledging there maranada rights gave written statements.
As a result the 3rd defendant was arrested in his private hotel in another county without warrant and signed a Miranda rights statement and gave a written statement.
The first 2 codefendants were arrested on a Wednesday night the other was arrested Thursday morning without a warrant and didnít see a judge until Saturday afternoon. Which clearly violates the Supreme Courts 48 hour rule
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: Motion to Supress Statements
It is hard to give an answer to your question. It appears the written statement is tainted based on the fact that it resulted from what seems like an improper arrest. The defendants should certainly seek legal representation.
Related Questions & Answers
Police and prosecutorial misconduct Taken to the police station after a traffic... Asked 2/11/05, 8:35 am in United States Illinois Criminal Law
Questioning We have been contacted by FBI as to our name coming up during an... Asked 1/24/05, 11:13 am in United States Illinois Criminal Law
Assault I was convicted of assault on June 15, 2002. I went to court on July 15,... Asked 1/24/05, 12:02 am in United States Illinois Criminal Law