account termed NPA then a tripartite agreement between the 2 directors and the guarantor was formed and 95% payment has been made but one of the directors has defaulted and the bank isnow wanting to file the case though the bank has filed a sec138 on the erring director what is the status and the guaronter should do in context to this had sold the asset before the account was NPA
Asked on 3/24/10, 8:24 pm
1 Answer from Attorneys
RAJIV GUPTA
(Cell: +91 9811284735) lawnrajiv@gmail.com
though the guarantor is liable for the payment but his defense can be made only after going through the relevant documents.
Answered on 3/28/10, 9:59 pm
Related Questions & Answers
-
Hello , Can anybody let me know whether sec 138 under NI Act case which Bombay High... Asked 3/24/10, 4:01 am in India Banking Law
-
I am from chennai,india. I have an outstanding of Rs.2,50,000(Two lakhs &fifty... Asked 3/23/10, 11:32 pm in India Banking Law
-
Intrest will be continue on npa account, or intrest will be stopped.? Asked 3/21/10, 8:14 am in India Banking Law
-
A propertywas auctioned under SARFAESI act and all the necessary rules were followed... Asked 3/21/10, 12:53 am in India Banking Law
-
Respected Sir , our bank has got cleared one cheque amounting to Rs. 1279100.00 by... Asked 3/20/10, 9:57 am in India Banking Law
