continuance of preliminary hearing due to evidence
I recently saw a district justice throw out a drug case at a preliminary hearing because the commonwealth did not have the drugs back from the lab to prove that they were in fact drugs. The arrest was only a week prior and it was not sufficient time for the commonwealth to have the drugs sent to a lab. Wasn't the commonwealth well within the law to ask for a continuance and should have been granted one due to the evidence not being ready?
Re: continuance of preliminary hearing due to evidence
Commonwealth should have requested, and likely would have been granted, a continuance in these circumstances. If they did not request a continuance, the Magisterial District Judge is within his authority to dismiss the charges. The police, however, may refile the charges once they get the evidence.