Legal Question in Credit and Debt Law in Tennessee

Debt Case Protocol and Procedures

I am being sued in civil court for a debt that I dispute. It is a debt owed to a state institution--a university. Is an attorney to represent me a necessity or even advisable? I have done research and have proof to back up my claim of denial; however, I have no idea if the pressing issue is for me to prove I don't owe or if they must prove that I do. Basically, I would like to know how the procedure will go. Do we both just present our evidence and a judge decides or will they present their evidence and I must rebut their claims.


Asked on 10/16/02, 9:27 am

1 Answer from Attorneys
Alan Crone Crone & McEvoy, PLC

Re: Debt Case Protocol and Procedures

Generally speaking the burden of proof is on the plaintiff, university. They present their case first. You get an opportunity to cross examine their witnesses. You then get an opportunity to present your side. If the other side has a lawyer you will treated at the same standard as a lawyer. If you have confidence that your case is strong you may not need a lawyer. That is your call. (I am a lawyer, but I would not try to rewire my house even though it looks easy.)

Read more
Answered on 10/18/02, 10:25 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Credit, Debt and Collections Law questions and answers in Tennessee