Legal Question in Real Estate Law in Washington

joint ownership, take two

My grandmother was one of six

sisters to inherit. 17 acres of

land on a small lake. Each sister was

left individual lot and the rest was

left undivided to all sisters.

Over the years the lots and shares of

the joint land changed hands. We

still have six individual lots owned by

three related families; two lots each.

The remaining acreage surrounding

the lots was divided into three tracts

and is owned in varying percentages

by the same three families. All

together we are 13 blood relatives;

33 including spouses and children.

Members of two of the families live

on the property year round. The

third uses it as a summer vacation

home. I don't know how this type of

ownership is classified, can you tell

me?

A legacy of honesty and respect has

always dictated good behaivor, but

that legacy has begun to

erode. Given the number of people

currently and prospectively involved,

and the growing distance from our

original blood ties we've all agreed to

explore the legal realities of

our situation.

Can a single owner grant a tenant

access across joint land to reach the

water? Who is liable if they

are injured?


Asked on 7/18/07, 10:24 pm

1 Answer from Attorneys

Elizabeth Powell ELizabeth Powell PS Inc

Re: joint ownership, take two

Well, I'm glad I picked this up again, but I'd still need to see each and every deed or other document vesting title to tell you what who owns and how.

I could tell you if I could see all of the documents, including probate orders.

One single owner has no greater right than any other owner to have a tenant, let alone to grant the tenant some access to some feature.

Access such as you are describing is called an easement. Is there an easement? Easements can be created by prescription (course of action over time) (or accident).

The person who will bear responsibility if an invitee is injured is the owner, or more properly, owners. "Joint and several liability" is the phrase that springs to mind.

This situation you are describing is a sensible reason to go to an attorney (each family member and spouse can have their OWN lawyer, no lawyer can responsibly advise all of you at the same time) and figure out some ground rules before this situation gets completely out of control.

Your family could form a trust and vest title to the property in one place - the trust, rather than continue to have smaller and smaller shares.

I cannot tell if that would help, but I sense your frustration and desire to get a handle on this. I think your instinct is correct, and I wish you the best.

Elizabeth Powell

Read more
Answered on 7/19/07, 1:12 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Real Estate and Real Property questions and answers in Washington