Legal Question in Administrative Law in California

Oaths in California Administrative Law

The Administrative Procedure Act, Government Code, Title 2, Division 3, Part 1, Section

§ 11513 only requires that “Oral evidence shall be taken only on oath or affirmation.”

Unlike California Code of Civil Procedure Section 2094(a) and (b), the Administration Procedure for evidence does not import the same admonitions against perjury and the threat of penalty from a higher power. By inference, that higher power is the almighty God and/or the judicial system through civil action.

An oath should be calculated to awaken the person's conscience and impress the person's mind with the duty to tell the truth. The court shall satisfy itself that the person testifying understands that his or her testimony is being given under penalty of perjury.

Has anyone ever suffered penalties for perjury in Administrative proceedings?


Asked on 10/14/07, 3:31 am

2 Answers from Attorneys

George Shers Law Offices of Georges H. Shers

Re: Oaths in California Administrative Law

Martha Stewart, etc.

Read more
Answered on 10/14/07, 12:21 pm
Bryan Whipple Bryan R. R. Whipple, Attorney at Law

Re: Oaths in California Administrative Law

Martha's case wasn't in California, but for sure there have been many successful prosecutions for perjury in California administrative proceedings.

Read more
Answered on 10/14/07, 3:29 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Administrative Law questions and answers in California