Legal Question in Civil Litigation in California

Employee protection when employer is sued for breach of contract

My previous employer was sued for Breach of Conduct. I was named as an individual defendant. Although I had a VP title, it was to help me in sales. I was not an officer of the company.

I was a salesperson and the author of the proposal to the plaintiff. The engagement was to develop a software business solution. I was provided the technical solution from a sub-contractor to my firm who specialized in this area.

When I left my previous employer, the contract was 90% completed. The technical problems that remained were considered correctable.

As a salesperson, I wrote the proposal in the belief that my previous employer was capable of providing the business solution.

Is my previous employer (a corporation)obligated to defend me in this lawsuit?

Do I need to respond to the lawsuit summons individually?

Does my previous employer's corporate status protect me from liability?


Asked on 12/14/04, 9:31 pm

5 Answers from Attorneys

Joel Selik www.SelikLaw.com

Re: Employee protection when employer is sued for breach of contract

Yes, the employer should provide to you a lawyer, it can be their own attorney as long as their is no conflict and they agree to indemnify you. They should provide a written agrement to indemnify.

In any event, you must answer the complaint, that is file a responsive document with the Court or there will be a default against you. Do not let this happen.

You may be protected from liability but probably not. Get a lawyer.

JOEL SELIK

Attorney at Law

800-894-2889

760-479-1515

702-243-1930

Licensed to Practice Law in California and Nevada Only

CA Licensed Real Estate Broker

CONCENTRATING IN REAL ESTATE, ELDER ABUSE, LITIGATION AND COLLECTIONS

Personal Injury, Contracts, Tax Matters, Business,

Malpractice, Appeals, Elder Neglect/Abuse/Nursing Home Malpractice

Real Estate, and Other Legal Matters

This is just general information. No representations are made and no attorney client relationship is established by this communication. In most matters there are strict time limitations within which actions may be taken or your rights will be compromised. We are not taking any action on your matter and will not be considered your attorney or tax representative until both you and we have signed a fee agreement.

We, therefore will take no action on your behalf unless a written retainer agreement is signed. There are strict deadlines, called statutes of limitation, within which claims or lawsuits must be filed. Therefore, if you do not retain SELIKLAW, you should immediately seek the services of another attorney or other advisor.

If you send a lawyer or law firm email, your email will not create an attorney-client relationship and will not necessarily be treated as privileged or confidential. You should not send sensitive or confidential information via email. The lawyer or law firm to whom you are writing may not choose to accept you as a client. Moreover, as the Internet is not necessarily a secure environment it is possible that your email sent via the Internet might be intercepted and read by third parties.

Read more
Answered on 12/15/04, 8:46 am
OCEAN BEACH ASSOCIATES OCEAN BEACH ASSOCIATES

Re: Employee protection when employer is sued for breach of contract

If you do not answer or your employer on your behalf a default judgment will be sought against you. Get representation immediately. Call me directly at (619) 222-3504.

Read more
Answered on 12/15/04, 2:04 pm
Larry Rothman Larry Rothman & Associates

Re: Employee protection when employer is sued for breach of contract

Your employer has the duty to defend you. If you incurred any legal fees or costs or were subject to damages, an action or motion for indemnification can be filed. Please call us if you have any other questions.

Read more
Answered on 12/23/04, 7:59 pm
Daniel Harrison Berger Harrison, APC

Re: Employee protection when employer is sued for breach of contract

If you signed the contract on your employer's (corporation's) behalf, you are not personally liable for the employer's breach of it. Although there are theories of "alter ego" to "pierce the corporate veil" to reach shareholders, it is not used to reach officers (unless they are also shareholders). The theories are disfavored and very difficult to prove. Officers are liable only for torts they commit. They are not liable on corporate contract obligations. You should demand that your employer defend and indemnify you in the lawsuit. If the employer does not, you can sue them for indemnity and recover defense costs, which include attorney's fees. Give us a call to discuss this further (the call is free).

Read more
Answered on 12/15/04, 7:13 pm
Edward Hoffman Law Offices of Edward A. Hoffman

Re: Employee protection when employer is sued for breach of contract

Generally employers are not required to defend individual employees when both are named as defendants. Most offer such a defense anyway, since the employee will generally be able to sue the company successfully if he wins the case and since paying a second set of lawyers is very expensive. But if the company is broke and can't do this, you are on your own. The fact that you worked for a company does not immunize you from personal liability.

But if the lawsuit alleges only breach of contract it will be hard for the plaintiff to justify his claim against you. Presumably the company was a party to the contract and you were not; a non-party can't breach any contract. Does the lawsuit also allege fraud? Does it say that you and the company were alter-egos of each other? Does it accuse you of interfering with the contract? Allegations like these might support naming you as a defendant.

If you haven't already done so, you should demand that the company defend and indemnify you. Hopefully it will agree. If you have homeowner's insurance, you might want to ask the insurer to defend you as well. Your policy may not cover this type of suit, but it shouldn't hurt to ask.

In the meantime, you need to protect your rights. If you don't answer the complaint within 30 days and don't get an agreement from the other side to give you more time, the plaintiff will probably have a default entered against you. Later, this default might lead to an actual judgment against you.

There are ways to have defaults set aside, but they don't always succeed and they do always take time and money. Default judgments are harder to remove. It's better to avoid a default in the first place than to have to deal with it later.

You really should have an attorney working for you. Hopefully the company will agree to help you out and you won't need your own lawyer for long, but it would be unwise to presume you won't need one and to just ignore the case.

Feel free to contact me directly if you want to discuss this further.

Read more
Answered on 12/14/04, 10:12 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More General Civil Litigation questions and answers in California