Legal Question in Landlord & Tenant Law in California

I purchased and moved into a mobile home in a park with my partner who paid half the rent. The lease was in my name only. The park was owned by a couple. They sold the park to a large slumlord corporation. My partner and I lived there together for three and a half years. I left to move across the country for a business opportunity. The onsite manager recommended we leave the space in my name because the rent would go up 50% if we changed it to my partner�s name. I agreed because I knew my partner would reliably pay the rent and could not afford to pay what would be 150% rent increase. One year later my partner wanted to go overseas to visit a dying relative and was planning to move from the park. My partner could not sell the trailer before leaving so my partner�s friend handled the sale of the trailer. They sold it to a person with bad credit so could not qualify for the lease. The manager agreed to let the person rent the space under my name without notifying me until they got a family member to guaranty the lease. When my partner inquired about my deposit the manager said it takes 60 days to process and I should call then. I called the manager after 60 days and was told I would have it in two weeks. Two weeks later the manager said the company is slow and wait another two weeks. Then the manager began avoiding my calls. I contacted the company and they said they never received any paperwork that I moved out. I faxed the signed paperwork from the sale of the trailer to the company twice but they said they didn�t receive it and I should contact their regional manager about the problem. I did this and emailed the document to the regional manager who acknowledged receiving it to me over the phone. The onsite manager was fired and regional manager told me they would have to evict the people from the trailer because they would not pay the required deposit or sign the lease or leave the trailer. The regional manager told me the companies� legal department was told not to do the unlawful detainer in my name and would do it in another parties name but I would not get back my deposit. I accepted that and stopped calling. It has now been more than one year since my partner sold the trailer and I have just received a letter from the companies� attorney regarding a civil judgment against me plus 10% annually. It references a case number which I looked up online and found the attorney had won an UD judgment against me six months ago. This is the first I�ve been informed about this case. I have never had any bad marks on my credit report or any judgments against me. I am concerned about my credit and bank accounts. I know I should have done many things differently. I would like to reverse the problem but if not possible or practical then I would like to protect myself from further damage.


Asked on 8/08/10, 7:18 am

1 Answer from Attorneys

David Gibbs The Gibbs Law Firm, APC

I have to be honest - there are so many things wrong in this email that I am not even sure where to start. First, let's start with the security deposit because that is an easy one, 'sort of.' California has a set of laws referred to as the Mobilehome Residency Law. They can be found at California Civil Code �798, et seq..

The applicable code section for security deposits is CC �798.39(b) which provides, in pertinent part, that: (b) As to all security deposits collected on or after January 1, 1989, after the homeowner has promptly paid to the management, within five days of the date the amount is due, all of the rent, utilities, and reasonable service charges for any 12-consecutive-month period subsequent to the collection of the security deposit by the management, or upon resale of the mobilehome, whichever occurs earlier, the management shall, upon the receipt of a written request from the homeowner, refund to the homeowner the amount of the security deposit within 30 days following the end of the 12-consecutive-month period of the prompt payment or the date of the resale of the mobilehome.

Your first problem is that if you never made demand for the security deposit before the UD judgment was entered, then they were only required to return it upon resale. The problem is that the on-site manager gave you some very bad advice. First, the lease should have been terminated when you first moved out of the home. I get the rent increase, but leaving yourself exposed for a home you no longer live in, or own was a very bad idea. Second, when the home was sold to another person, you clearly should have not agreed to remain on the lease. The code section only applies when you write and request return of the security deposit, OR when the home is resold. Resold means that the new buyer has made application for, and been approved by the management for residency in the park. For as long as the new buyer lived there without being on the lease, you were on the hook for unpaid rent, AND the landlord may have no duty to return your security deposit. Once the UD was filed, and the new buyer evicted, your security deposit was used to help reimburse the landlord for the unpaid rent, and you are probably not entitled to recover it. You should, however, receive credit for the deposit against the judgment.

Finally, you may be able to set aside the judgment, but it will require that you file a motion within six months of the date of the entry of default. If six months has passed, you can almost certainly not get relief from the default judgment, and must enter into some sort of agreement with the landlord's attorney to resolve the debt before they start levying your bank accounts, and garnishing your wages. I strongly suggest you retain an attorney to assist you with all of this, as there are some very subtle nuances to mobilehome residency law, and landlord-tenant matters. There may be other defenses to this, but your time may have come and gone to obtain relief from the judgment.

*Due to the limitations of the LawGuru Forums, The Gibbs Law Firm, APC's (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided is general and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence. As required by 11 U.S.C. �528, we must now disclose that, "We are a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code. Assistance we provide with respect to Debt Relief may involve bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code."

Read more
Answered on 8/18/10, 3:40 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Landlord & Tenants questions and answers in California