Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California

Lease

We put our house up for sale back in January and immediately received 8 offers going up over the asking price and have been waiting ever since for a short sale approval from Countrywide. Many errors on the part of Countrywide. We thought given the amount of the offers and the number of offers it would be a fairily quick process and given the fact we could not pay the more than $4200 mortgage payments and we didn't want to feel like squaters in our own home we decided to move out and try to start moving on. In February we signed a 12 month lease on a house. Now, with the new Hope for Homeowners Act that went into effect October 1, we understand we may now be able to save our house. We need to go home and live there to be able to try to save it. Our landlords do not want to allow us out of our lease without full payment for the remaining 4 months. Given the fact that a new law may allow us to keep our house can they force us to stay in the lease? Is there any legal way out that will not cost us full payment of the remaining 4 months of the lease?


Asked on 10/13/08, 6:17 pm

1 Answer from Attorneys

David Gibbs The Gibbs Law Firm, APC

Re: Lease

Your lease with the landlord is not affected by either the new Act, nor your issues with your residence. If you signed a 12 month lease, why is it fair to the landlord (who wasn't a party to the sale of your home, your Countrywide Mortgage nor the new law put in place) that you should be able to just walk away from that obligation? Its not, and so the answer is you cannot just terminate your 12 month lease. That being said, the landlord, once you notify him of your intent to move, has an obligation to mitigate his damages. In other words, he can't just let the house you were renting sit fallow for four more months and collect rent from you. He has to attempt to relet the property, and you will be responsbile for rent from the date you move out, until he is able to relet the property; you are also liable for all of his expenses attributable to reletting the property (advertising, agent fees, etc...) and finally, you are liable for any difference in rent that he can collect for those four months (if he has to rent it for less to get it filled). I'd be very very careful about this New Hope for Homeowners Act - before you jump back to your home and incur a big penalty from your landlord, you had better do your research to be sure you qualify for relief, that the relief will come in time to help you, and that you have an exit plan as I believe the relief under the Act is only temporary and not permenant. Assuming you stopped paying your mortgage in January or February, you're staring at $42,000 in past due P&I payments, plus interest, late fees and penalties. I'd be very very cautious about moving back on the hope that this Act will help you - like most legislation, its full of holes and traps and it would be devestating to move back into the house only to lose it a little further down the road.

*Due to the limitations of the LawGuru Forums, The Gibbs Law Firm, APC's (the "Firm") participation in responding to questions posted herein does not constitute legal advice, nor legal representation of the person or entity posting a question. No Attorney/Client relationship is or shall be construed to be created hereby. The information provided is general and requires that the poster obtain specific legal advice from an attorney. The poster shall not rely upon the information provided herein as legal advice nor as the basis for making any decisions of legal consequence.

Read more
Answered on 10/13/08, 7:12 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Real Estate and Real Property questions and answers in California