Legal Question in Workers Comp in New York

Please help

I injured my knee at work in 10/05. The question of apportionment came up before, there was a hearing on it the judge dismissed it because there was no previous work related injuries. I had prior surgery on that knee about 21 years ago. I have worked in factories for 19 years, 11 of those were at the job where I injured my knee. I asked my doctor about the apportionment when it was in question he said that my injury was completely work- related. The inc. co. wanted my doctor�s testimony he told them that he feels that the case should have a apportionment. My layer from the beginning seems as if she does not want to argue, she just goes along with what it said. She is now telling me that the case is going back for the apportionment because of that, even though what my doctor has said goes against what all of the other doctors have said even the insyrance co. doctor. Could someone please help me?


Asked on 11/06/08, 1:50 pm

2 Answers from Attorneys

Michael Stacy Law Offices of Michael P. Stacy

Re: Please help

You raise an interesting question of when apportionment applies. Prior to a finding of permanency, the Court looks at whether your prior injury was actively symptomatic at or around the time that the work accident occurred. This is typically characterized by active symptomatic treatment or recent lost time from work right around the time of the accident. If it is not actively symptomatic, there is no apportionment. But this is only during periods of "temporary" disability. When considering permanency or schedule loss of use, the law permits the consideration of apportionment to the extent that evaluation of loss of use is based on things like permanent range of motion. Basically if you had a prior permanent loss of range of motion, the Court can consider that as part of the overall loss of use even if that injury was not "actively" symptomatically affecting your ability to work at the time of the work accident. Whether or not apportionment applies will come down to the testimony of the doctors and how they address these issues. Bottom line: apportionment may still be an issue at permanency even if it was not an issue at the beginning of the case.

Read more
Answered on 11/06/08, 3:24 pm
Jason Kessler Law Offices of Jason B. Kessler, P.C.

Re: Please help

You have a lawyer and I do not think that it is proper or right to second guess your lawyer. Please note that this website is for those persons who are unrepresented. Your lawyer obviously knows your file and has spent countless hours litigating your case. Unfortunately, your own doctor finds apportionment. So, there is really nothing that your lawyer can do.

If you are upset with your lawyer go to the injured bar association website and try to find another lawyer.

Read more
Answered on 11/06/08, 1:54 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Workers' Compensation Law questions and answers in New York