Legal Question in Criminal Law in Vermont

Firearms restrictions

My Son was drunk one night, and we ( his parents) got into a ''scuffle'' with him. He got hurt as I (Dad) hit him. We called 911 due to concern for his condition to get help for him. Now the State has pressed Domestic assault charges against him on 2 accounts. They are offering to drop one count, and reduce the other to SIMPLE ASSAULT. Our question is if this count of SIMPLE ASSAULT stemming from domestic assault will take away his right to bear arms under the seccond ammendment, and even our Public Defender cannot answer this for us! Neither can the State's Attorney! We are looking at only a couple days to make this decision! Can you answer this for us ASAP? THANKS!


Asked on 10/11/04, 8:37 am

1 Answer from Attorneys

Edward Hoffman Law Offices of Edward A. Hoffman

Re: Firearms restrictions

To my knowledge, no court has ever held that the second amendment actually gives individuals the right to bear arms. Several courts have specifically said that it does not, so the theory that Americans have a constitutional right to own guns is batting .000.

The second amendment was written in order to permit states to operate civil militias, and its authors might be quite surprised to learn that people now argue that it means everyone can own a gun.

Of course, the fact that gun ownership is not enshrined in the Constitution doesn't imply that owning guns is illegal. The Constitution simply doesn't address the issue on way or the other.

This means that your local court can include a restriction on gun ownership as a condition of your son's sentence. Since I am not a Vermont attorney I can't say whether it will or not, but I also don't see what difference it makes. Your son is hardly in a position to dictate the terms of his sentence.

I also urge you to consider whether you really want to have guns in your home at all. All I know about your family is what you have written, but having guns lying around a house where family members get into drunken brawls so serious that the police have to intervene is just asking for trouble. It is also a good example of why sensible gun control is a good idea. After all, even if the kind of event you describe is not an everyday occurrence in your home, it only needs to happen once for things to go horribly awry.

Read more
Answered on 10/11/04, 7:08 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Criminal Law questions and answers in Vermont