Legal Question in Business Law in California

Non-competition clauses are unenforceable in California. If they actually said the contract was null and void, that means it basically never existed, so the clause also never existed.

As you might imagine, the answer is "it depends"...upon the "survival" clauses in the signed agreement on the non-competition provisions...so, if you qualify for our "pro bono" programs", we do offer a FREE 15 minute email initial review of most business documents/agreements.

By Grace...

Shawn Jackson ESQ. (707) 584-4529

Business Development Attorney

No communication resulting herein shall create an attorney-client relationship unless a separate retainer agreement is signed by attorney and client. The information provided neither is legal advice nor is it conveyed in the course of an attorney-client relationship, but is intended merely as a general overview with regard to the subject matter covered. You should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel such as any attorney in this office in a subsequent email communication (agreement) and the formation of an attorney client relationship.

EMAIL: [email protected]

www.CaliforniaBusinessDevelopmentAttorneys.com

www.CaliforniaBusinessDevelopmentCenter.com

www.CaliforniaBusinessDevelopmentPlans.com

Generally no. Just do not violate the rules on 'unfair competition' and avoid legal problems.

California law contains a strong prohibition against non-competition agreements, with limited exceptions. The statute at issue, California Business and Professions Code section 16600, specifically states:

Except as provided in this chapter, every contract by which anyone is restrained from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business of any kind is to that extent void.

California courts have interpreted the law quite strictly ruling that section 16600 reflects an important state public policy favoring the right of employees to change jobs freely. Courts have held that �the interests of the employee in his own mobility and betterment are deemed paramount to the competitive business interests of the employers, where neither the employee nor his new employer has committed any illegal act accompanying the employment change.� (Metro Traffic Control, Inc. v. Shadow Traffic Network (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 853, 860.)

You may want to look at Business and Professions Code section 16600, and the sections around that section, to determine whether you meet one of the exceptions.

I agree most strongly with Mr. Roach. I disagree with Mr. Jackson.