Legal Question in Family Law in California

As a 65 year old man, I married an 18 year old citizen of the Philippines. At time I believed we had a tacit agreement. She would have my support and be petitioned to the United States while I would have her companionship and intimacy. Our marriage, after just short of five years ,has now come to grief and I am preparing to divorce her. Is there no relief in law from failure to perform marriage vows and no way way to prove bad faith? I had discovered her being intimate with other men several times during the marriage. In other words is there any way to prevent claims against one's separate property being enforced by the court on the basis that one has been defrauded?


Asked on 6/02/12, 12:22 pm

2 Answers from Attorneys

There are various ways to defend claims against your separate property, but fraud is not one of them. Fraud is ground for annulment, but not after 5 years. There is a three-year statute of limitations for any action based on fraud, not to mention that fraudulent promise without intent to perform is one of the most difficult claims to prove. How do you prove they did not just change their mind? If you are concerned about claims against your separate property, and/or other financial claims in a divorce proceeding, you need to retain a family law attorney such as myself, at least on a consulting basis, if not to fully handle the case for you.

Read more
Answered on 6/02/12, 12:40 pm
Anthony Roach Law Office of Anthony A. Roach

A judgment of nullity on the ground of �fraud� is proper only in extreme cases where the particular fraud goes to the very essence of the marriage relation. �A marriage may be annulled for fraud only in an extreme case where the particular fraud goes to the very essence of the marriage relation.� (In re Marriage of Ramirez (4th Dist. 2008) 165 Cal.App.4th 751, 757.)

Instead, the particular fraudulent intention must relate to the sexual or procreative aspects of marriage. In the absence of this type of fraud, the longstanding rule is that neither party may question the validity of the marriage upon the ground of express or implied representations of the other with respect to such matters as character, habits, chastity, business or social standing, financial worth or prospects, or matters of a similar nature. (In re Marriage of Meagher and Maleki (4th Dist. 2005) 131 Cal.App.4th 1, 3.)

Your separate property would just be confirmed as your separate property in any divorce. You may, however, have to pay spousal support. I suggest you speak to a competent family law attorney.

Read more
Answered on 6/02/12, 1:49 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Family Law, Divorce, Child Custody and Adoption questions and answers in California