Legal Question in Civil Litigation in California

Personal Privacy on the Internet

I am a member of AOL, and a member in a chat room has chosen to continously make public, private conversations she has had with others. I have contacted AOL about this, and the matter is pending. Do you have any suggestions? And, the woman also has created a webpage of one of the members, with very derogatory remarks about her, along with personal information and letters written about her. She also has a private conversation posted that she had with one of the members a few months ago. She has done this without the knowledge and/or approval of those involved. Can anything be done about this? What options do we have?


Asked on 5/08/04, 12:46 am

1 Answer from Attorneys

Robert F. Cohen Law Office of Robert F. Cohen

Re: Personal Privacy on the Internet

Is the web page hosted by AOL? If so, send 'em a letter explaining that it contains private material and it should be taken down immediately. As for making public your private IMs, she should lose her AOL privileges and you should not communicate with her any more.

You also may have a claim for invasion of privacy. Interestingly, California law prohibits the recording of a private conversation without the other party's consent. See Penal Code section 632(a) & (c) which state in part: "(a) Every person who, intentionally and without the consent of all parties to a confidential communication, by means of any electronic amplifying or recording device, eavesdrops upon or records the confidential communication, whether the communication is carried on among the parties in the presence of one another or by means of a telegraph, telephone, or other device, except a radio, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500), or imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison, or by both that fine and imprisonment. . . . (c) The term "confidential communication" includes any communication carried on in circumstances as may reasonably indicate that any party to the communication desires it to be confined to the parties thereto, but excludes a communication made in a public gathering or in any legislative, judicial, executive or administrative proceeding open to the public, or in any other circumstance in which the parties to the communication may reasonably expect that the communication may be overheard or recorded."

"A private chat room is limited to the sender and recipient; no one else has access to their dialogue while they are in the 'instant message' mode." Cyberspace Communications, Inc. v. Engler (1999 E.D.Mich.) 55 F.Supp.2d 737, 743.

Good luck. I hope AOL comes to your aid.

Read more
Answered on 5/08/04, 5:11 am


Related Questions & Answers

More General Civil Litigation questions and answers in California