Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California

A four unit building is in escrow in Berkeley and the Buyer wants to move into one of the units of the property. The current owner exercised an owner move in over 10 years ago and has since moved out of the property and rented the unit to a tenant. The new buyer wants to move into another unit, but the city of Berkeley says that according to the Measure Y Ordinance, the new buyer must move into the SAME unit as the owner did over 10 years ago.

This seems troubling since, according to Berkeley, a new owner is handcuffed into not having a choice to choose the unit he wishes to move into. Is this correct? I�d assume they could be wrong here since it seems as though they are violating a person�s right to property.


Asked on 6/01/12, 4:10 pm

3 Answers from Attorneys

Bryan Whipple Bryan R. R. Whipple, Attorney at Law

The Berkeley rent control ordinance is lengthy and perhaps, to a landlord, Draconian. It can be found on line at http://www.ci.berkeley.ca.us/ContentDisplay.aspx?id=9296. I think you need to compare what someone in City government is telling you with the language of the ordinance and see if you agree.......it seems probable to me that your "advice" is mistaken, but perhaps not. I am not an authority on the contents or interpretation of the ordinance, although I have been a Berkeley landlord (many years ago, and before becoming an attorney). My hunch is the interpretation is wrong because it makes no sense, but what else makes sense in Berkeley?

Read more
Answered on 6/01/12, 5:27 pm

I'm afraid it is true: "Once a landlord has successfully recovered possession of a rental unit pursuant to this subsection (13.76.130A.9), then no other current or future landlords may recover possession of any other rental unit on the property pursuant to Subsection 13.76.130A.9a. It is the intention of this subsection that only one specific unit per property may be used for such occupancy under Subsection 13.76.130A.9a and that once a unit is used for such occupancy, all future occupancies under Subsection 13.76.130A.9a must be of that same unit." (Berkeley Municipal Code section 13.76.130A, subsection 9h). This does not prevent you from moving into another unit once it becomes vacant. It only limits the unit that can be used for a forced eviction so the owner (or other qualified owner's relation) can move in. So your only options are to force the current tenant out of the unit that was used for owner occupancy before, and then wait for the unit you want to become vacant, and move in there and rent the eviction unit out again, or live elsewhere until the unit you want becomes vacant.

Read more
Answered on 6/02/12, 12:59 pm
Anthony Roach Law Office of Anthony A. Roach

The purpose is to keep landlords from using the excuse that they want to live in a different unit to be used to evict tenants, which could be used to circumvent Berkeley's rent control ordinances. You should also be familiar with the Ellis Act, which may govern this situation.

Read more
Answered on 6/02/12, 1:55 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Real Estate and Real Property questions and answers in California