Can an appeal be made in Supreme court of India against its own judgement by other Scientists (SLP (Civil) 11219 of 2012 ) in which SC restricted to only those Scientists who were part of the petetion before SC and CAT.
ITEM NO. 6 COURT NO.6 SECTION XVII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).11219/2012
(From the judgement and order dated 27/03/2012 in WP No.2503/2009 of The
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI)
CENTRAL SILK BOARD Petitioner(s)
Z.M.S.KHAN & ORS. Respondent(s)
(With appln(s) for permission to file additional documents and prayer for
interim relief and office report)
(FOR FINAL DISPOSAL)
Date: 10/04/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR
For Petitioner(s) Mr. P.P. Rao, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Mahalakshmi Pavani,Adv.
Mr. G. Balaji, Adv.
Mr. Akshat Kulshreshta, Adv.
Ms. Saumya Misra, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Dr. Rajeev Dhawan, Sr. Adv.
Ms. M.M. Pal, Adv.
Mr. Santosh Mishra, Adv.
Mr. Sudeepto Pal, Adv.
Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay,Adv.
Mr. S.P. Singh, Sr, Adv.
Mr. D.L.Chidanand, Adv.
Mrs. Gargi Khanna, Adv.
Ms. S.K. Bajwa, Adv.
Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal,Adv
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
This special leave petition is directed against
the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Jharkhand in
WP(S) No. 2503 of 2009, dated 27.03.2012. By the impugned
judgment and order, the High Court has affirmed the orders
passed by the Tribunal in O.A. No. 75 of 2008, dated 13.01.2009.
We have heard Shri P.P. Rao, learned senior counsel for
the petitioner, Dr. Rajiv Dhawan, learned senior counsel for the
respondents and Mr. S.P. Singh, learned senior counsel for the
Union of India.
In our opinion, taking into consideration the fact that
the financial implication on the petitioner-organization is too
meagre, we are not inclined to exercise our powers under Article
136 of the Constitution of India to annul the judgment(s) and
order(s) passed by the Tribunal and affirmed by the High Court.
Accordingly, we dismiss this special leave petition.
However, it is clarified that the judgment(s) and
order(s) passed by the Tribunal and affirmed by the High Court
are only in respect of those Scientists who were before the
Tribunal as applicants and are respondents in this special leave
The question of law raised and argued by Shri P.P. Rao,
learned senior counsel is kept open, to be agitated in an
All the contentions of both the parties are left open.
We further clarify that this order shall not be treated
as a precedent in any other case.
| [ Charanjeet Kaur ] | | [ Vinod Kulvi ] |
|Court Master | |Asstt. Registrar |
1 Answer from Attorneys
review of the order may be filed if cogent grounds are available.
thanks and regards
Related Questions & Answers
One of our employee had fled away with some money for which we have an insurance... Asked 7/13/13, 1:30 am in India Appeals and Writs
Sub- sexual harrassment & termination in private university i am senior lecturer... Asked 7/13/13, 12:49 am in India Appeals and Writs
I am an senior architect in central govt .My boss chief engineer has issued a... Asked 7/09/13, 8:19 pm in India Appeals and Writs
I want 2 help my friend,she had a secret nikha,bt dis guy is playing vth her,he is... Asked 6/25/13, 7:56 am in India Appeals and Writs
Dear Sir/Madam..Myself Manish Verma from Delhi. I got married to Ms. Pinki on... Asked 6/19/13, 9:58 pm in India Appeals and Writs