Legal Question in Civil Litigation in California

We have a strong case of Fraud/intentional misrepresentation against the sellers of a home we purchased in Dec 2007. We are bound by the Purchase Agreement to first initiate Mediation, then binding Arbitration if Mediation fails. Trial is only the last option.

We have been discovering and accumulating these instances of fraud/misrepresentation since Jan 2008 when we moved into the house. This week we sent the sellers a letter inviting them to mediation at a neutral venue. However mediation is a voluntary process and we are not convinced the sellers will agree to a fair settlement, knowing their past history.

We are concerned about the statute of limitations which we're told is 2 years for a case like this, which means we're in danger of going outside of the statute after December 2009. What we're afraid of is that if the mediation/arbitration process drags on beyond Dec 2009, and we don't get justice from this process, we won't be allowed to file suit later on by the statute of limitations clause.

Question:

- Since we're convinced of Fraud and have irrefutable evidence to support our claim, are we allowed to file suit against them right away?

- Does serving the mediation letter to the sellers start the clock on the statute?

Thanks in advance


Asked on 10/19/09, 1:52 pm

2 Answers from Attorneys

Aaron Feldman Feldman Law Group

You should probably consult with an attorney right away given the concern about the Statute of Limitations. In particular, you need to confirm that your claims are governed by the arbitration provision (they should be). Mediation participation is required if you hope to recover attorney's fees as damages (in most real estate contracts), but you are correct in believing that the case may not settle. If the claims are within the arbitration provisions, then you need either a written agreement with the other side or a Petition to Compel arbitration within the statute of limitations. Again, the best thing for you to do is to sit down with an attorney who can review the case with you and review the applicable contracts and documentation.

Read more
Answered on 10/19/09, 2:05 pm

I agree with Mr. Feldman that you should sit down with an attorney as soon as possible. There is no benefit to waiting. To answer your specific questions:

-- If the nature of the fraud is such that the contract itself is fraudulent and you want to have it voided, then yes, you can sue right away. If, however, you have the more common types of fraud in a residential real estate sale, such as undisclosed defects, and assuming you used a standard CAR form purchase agreement, you will have to mediate before filing suit.

The clock on the statute is not started by anything to do with the mediation. It starts with the first breach of the contract, or when you first knew or should have known of the fraud. The good news is that you probably have another year left to go on the shortest statute that would apply. The only exception is if you want to enforce an oral contract. The limitations period for that is two years from the first breach of the contract.

I have over twenty years experience in real estate law, including six years as a vice-president and senior litigation counsel for the parent company of Fidelity National Title and Chicago Title. I have also served as a Judge Pro Tempore in Santa Clara County since 1994. I provide both legal representation to parties in disputes, and serve as a neutral mediator and arbitrator. I have office and conference facilities in Palo Alto, Sunnyvale, Cupertino, and across from the courthouse in San Jose. If there is any way I can be of service to you, either as legal counsel or as a professional neutral, please let me know.

Read more
Answered on 10/19/09, 3:17 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More General Civil Litigation questions and answers in California