Good question. I think a case could be made that the 750K note was a "novation" and replaced the 650K note entirely, including your guaranty, but this is a gut feel and I would need to read both notes, learn about the surrounding circumstances, and then do a little research in order to be reasonably sure.

You have several arguments. If you are being sued and are serious about obtaining representation to help protect you, please contact me.

Best,

Daniel Bakondi, Esq.

danielbakondi@yahoo.com

415-450-0424

The Law Office of Daniel Bakondi, APLC

870 Market Street, Suite 1161

San Francisco CA 94102

http://www.danielbakondi.com

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This communication may contain confidential information, privileged information, or attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient or received this message in error, any use or distribution of this message is strictly prohibited and unlawful. Please notify the sender immediately, and delete this message. No attorney-client nor confidential relationship is created through this communication. Nothing communicated or provided constitutes legal advice nor a legal opinion unless it so specifies and written agreement for attorney services has been entered into. Attorney licensed in California only. Your issue may be time sensitive and may result in loss of rights if you do not act in time. Thank you.

Steve, without reading the exact language of both notes it is not possible to answer your question, however, assuming the 2nd note did not relieve you of your liability, you would be liable. However, the GOOD NEWS is that you have several defenses. First, the Statute of Limitations has probably run on any lawsuit that could be filed against you. (These Statutes are found in California Code of Civil Procedure, Sections 335 - 349. You can read them yourself to see which ones might apply to you, but Section 337 states that most instruments in writing have a limitations period of 4 years.) Additionally, if you were misinformed about your friend's intentions to pay off the note, you can claim a defense of fraud and/or misrepresentation against him/her. There are a number of other defenses that might apply to your situation, but I think your strongest is the Statute of Limitations which bars anyone from suing you after all this time. It would be a good idea to speak with an attorney to get a full picture of all of your rights. I wish you the best of luck. Susan Adler, Esq.

The original and second Notes' terms and conditions will ultimately determine the answer. You can get a consultation with counsel, and get an 'opinion', but that is not, and never can be, a guarantee of outcome. If you are sued, you get to argue it out in litigation. Don't even think of doing this without an experienced attorney, you have way too much at risk. He can raise all your defenses with whatever admissible and credible witnesses, evidence and facts are available for legal arguments. If serious about hiring counsel to do whatever is possible for you, feel free to contact me.