I don't see why the father would be liable. Even if there was reason to think the son might be violent -- and nothing you have written suggests that there was -- he had to live somewhere. The father may have helped him live in a better area than he would have otherwise, but that did not make the son kill your friend's husband.

With more information I might see some basis to pursue the father. But you would need some really extraordinary facts.

I'm sorry I can't be more encouraging.

In addition to the above explanation of lack of legal basis, such case would have to have been filed within two years of the death.

You should contact an attorney quickly, as the two year mark may make it harder. I would like to know what the father did wrong. Should his son have been in an institution or under care? Did he have information as to such or the risks, or pull some strings to get the son to live by himself when he shouldn't have been? Then, maybe there is something you can do, and I would be interested in hearing your facts if you want to send me an email. Again, act quickly, hopefully you are in time.

Best,

Daniel Bakondi, Esq.

danielbakondi@yahoo.com

415-450-0424

The Law Office of Daniel Bakondi, APLC

870 Market Street, Suite 1161

San Francisco CA 94102

http://www.danielbakondi.com

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This communication may contain confidential information, privileged information, or attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient or received this message in error, any use or distribution of this message is strictly prohibited and unlawful. Please notify the sender immediately, and delete this message. No attorney-client nor confidential relationship is created through this communication. Nothing communicated or provided constitutes legal advice nor a legal opinion unless it so specifies and written agreement for attorney services has been entered into. Attorney licensed in California only. Your issue may be time sensitive and may result in loss of rights if you do not act in time. Thank you.