Legal Question in Intellectual Property in California

Traditionally, a contingency fee arrangement is predicated on the lawyer getting a percentage of any recovery. This is reasonably easy for a lawyer to negotiate with a client in, say, a negligence case, where the client's dmages, injuries, etc. have a significant and known or provable value.

Here, your damages are probably more prospective than already-suffered, and you're probably more interested in getting a TRO and injunction than a specific and significant money damages judgment. I think this may be a problem. Also, good intellectual-property attorneys are busy and (as far as I know) not starving for work or fees. (I am not one of them).

The bottom line is, you might be better off paying someone a small flat fee to write a cease-and-desist letter. Then, if that doesn't get results, negotiate with the attorney who wrote the letter and/or a couple others; at that time, your case may be stronger or the issues and your damages more clearly defined.

A cease and desist letter should ensure your rights.

regards

Seshadri Srinivasan Esq.