Different opinion 2 the same problem--which is correct & why?
Our is a hindu family. Parents no more.Sisters r married. Brothers want division of the property.Sisters r no more coparceners of HUF, BEING MARRIED,.Is it correct 2 divide the assests of the Huf 2 which my father was Karta amongest the brothers Only without anything 4 the sisters?l.Different advises we r getting. some say the division is 2 b governed by succession law, while other say that the brothers r the only owners of the assessts of the said HUF as sisters r no members of the said HUF & BECAUSE a division of the assesst of Huf between MARRIED sisters & brothers not correct as the division of HUF Can only b done among COPARCENERS & Married sisters after marrige cease 2 b members of HUF of their Father's HUF. FATHER HAD not INHERETED ANY PROPERTY /ASSESTS FROM OUR GRANDFATHER.Which law will prevail over the other HUF or succession & WHY.