My appointment letter states that
"Your appointment is terminable on 1-month notice on either side provided that the institute may have sufficient reasons either reduce this period or required you to continue till the end of the academic session in which the notice is received".
In such conditions can i assured to be relieved within 1-month notice period. Also the second part of the condition "provided that the institute...is received" is legally correct, it is one sided only
1 Answer from Attorneys
Dear Sir / Madam,
The concerned Company / Institution errs by stating contradictory clauses in the Appointment Letter like 1 month's notice either side on the one hand, and asking the employee to continue till the end of the academic session which may be anything from 2 - 6 months or even a year on the other.
YES, it is one sided and hence against the principles of natural justice.
You and all the staff together should get this clarified from the HR / Principal of the Institution.
Related Questions & Answers
I have a service bond of 3 years of Rs 150000.But I left the company 6 months left... Asked 9/18/13, 11:45 pm in India Labor and Employment Law
Hi, I work in an IT firm in India. Currently I have resigned as I have a good... Asked 9/18/13, 12:54 pm in India Labor and Employment Law
Sir i was a registered pharmacist in a retail medical shop my question is one day... Asked 9/18/13, 7:54 am in India Labor and Employment Law
I am from india i work in a college ,and my father is seriously ill , there is no... Asked 9/18/13, 2:08 am in India Labor and Employment Law
Dear Sir, One month before I have joined one company , in appointment letter it is... Asked 9/17/13, 12:39 am in India Labor and Employment Law