New Jersey  |  Family Law

Legal Question

Asked on: 7/31/13, 11:35 am

In a child custody case in NJ, the Plaintiff (my wife, pro se) and the Defendant have traded interrogatories. There are several answers from the Defendant that we would like to call to the attention of the court in a Plenary Hearing. Should we enter the whole document in its entirety as evidence and call the attention to specific questions during the trial, or, do we refer to it as an Affidavit or something else and call the courts attention to an answer or two without entering it or the rest into evidence? What will be considered in evidence and not? Can we reference something not in evidence during a cross examination of a witness for the Defendant in an attempt to impeach the witness?

2 Answers


Answered on: 7/31/13, 12:07 pm by SAUL SEGAN

Don't play around. This is too important. Get a lawyer!

Good luck to you

Saul


Did you find this answer helpful?

0 Users found this answer helpful.

0 Attorneys agree with this answer.


SAUL H SEGAN ATTY AT LAW 1760 Market Street-Ste 400 Philadelphia, PA 19103

Other answers from this attorney

Answered on: 7/31/13, 2:47 pm by Jef Henninger, Esq

This is like asking a surgeon tips on how to do brain surgery. Nothing an attorney tells you is going to help you.


Did you find this answer helpful?

0 Users found this answer helpful.

0 Attorneys agree with this answer.


Law Offices of Jef Henninger, Esq. 8 Offices in New Jersey Tinton Falls, Newark, Toms Riv, NJ 08901

Other answers from this attorney

Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask an Attorney!

Get answers from the top Attorneys
Ask Question

70 Answers given in the last few hours.

86611 Active attorneys ready to answer your question

Search Past Answers:
  Advanced Search