New York  |  Intellectual Property

Legal Question

Asked on: 9/17/13, 3:04 pm

What is the legality of depicting various brands, logos, advertisements, etc. in a youtube video used to promote a marketing/branding company? Does anything change if that YouTube video is posted to said marketing company's website? Is there a way to shoot (film) advertisements, logos, etc. without infringing on any laws?

2 Answers

Answered on: 9/17/13, 4:12 pm by Roman Fichman Esq.

Generally speaking, even though under certain circumstances the law allows to use trademarks without prior permission from the mark owner, the use you asked about could present significant problems and expose you to liability.

With proper review it may be possible to use trademarks and stay within the framework of the law. Unfortunately without being retained so an attorney can review your use, the question cannot be answered.

My law office has a special offer for LawGuru users where we can conduct a limited review of the matter at a total cost of $99 an hour. The review of this matter and telephone discussion with you should take about an hour. To take advantage of this limited offer please go to:

Disclaimer: This post has been written for educational purposes only and was not meant to be legal advice and should not be construed as legal advice or be relied upon. No intention exists to create an attorney-client relationship or any other special relationship or privilege through this post. The post may contain errors, inaccuracies and/or omissions. You should always consult an attorney admitted to practice in your jurisdiction for specific advice. This post may be deemed as Attorney Advertising.

Did you find this answer helpful?

0 Users found this answer helpful.

0 Attorneys agree with this answer.

Law Practice of Roman Fichman Esq. New York Manhattan, NY 10011-1607

Other answers from this attorney

Answered on: 9/18/13, 7:37 am by Frank Natoli

This is a very grey and highly contested area. The general rule regards to using another's mark, as dictated by the 2nd Circuit, I believe, is "use no more than what is necessary." I will add, that the outcome of a case like this will matter greatly depending on where the case is heard (e.g., 9th Circuit, 2nd Circuit, 7th Circuit will all have varying opinions on this).

What many lawyers interpret this to mean is that using logos is almost always "more than what is necessary" as opposed to just using the text name. But of course, you can refer to other brands and I'm sure you have seen this in ads, etc. it is concept know as "nominative fair use, " you should look that up.

It is very hard to say here where I would come out regards to your situation. I think if you are using many different brands as opposed to just one or a couple it weighs in your favor. That is it makes it harder for them to claim market confusion when their brand was one of a dozen depicted. But you will always run the risk of a mark holder getting irritated by your use of their mark.

If you are planning a serious effort here, I strongly suggest you consult an IP lawyer in private and get some specific guidance. If you would like to discuss further over a free phone consult, feel free to contact me anytime that is convenient.

Kind regards,



DISCLAIMER: this is not intended to be specific legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. No attorney-client relationship is formed on the basis

Did you find this answer helpful?

0 Users found this answer helpful.

0 Attorneys agree with this answer.

Natoli-Lapin, LLC 304 Park Avenue South, 11th Floor New York, NY 10010

Other answers from this attorney

Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask an Attorney!

Get answers from the top Attorneys
Ask Question

125 Answers given in the last few hours.

8663 Active attorneys ready to answer your question

Search Past Answers:
  Advanced Search