California  |  Landlord & Tenant Law

Legal Question

Asked on: 8/19/13, 9:33 am

My rental agreement states that is "month to month" but the agreement specifies that i must provide 60 day notice to vacate and the landlord must provide 60 day notice to evict, isn't this actually a 60 day lease? How much notice must my landlord provide before increasing the rent?

1 Answer


Answered on: 8/19/13, 2:21 pm by Timothy McCormick

It is considered "month-to-month" because it is paid monthly and has no expiration. "Month-to-month" really is not a legal term. It is not a 60-day lease either, because it does not expire at the end of 60 days. The technical legal term is a "tenancy at will." In any case, however, the exact label is irrelevant. What counts is the agreement and any law that supersedes any term of the agreement. In your case you have each agreed to give 60-days notice of a termination of the tenancy. That is perfectly legal and binding. As for how much notice the landlord must give, in the absence of any terms in the agreement, the landlord must give 30-days notice of any change in the terms or conditions of the tenancy if you have lived there less than a year, and 60-days if you have been there more than a year.


Did you find this answer helpful?

0 Users found this answer helpful.

0 Attorneys agree with this answer.


Libris Solutions - Dispute Resolution Services 201 Spear St., Suite 1100 San Francisco, CA 94105

Other answers from this attorney

Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask an Attorney!

Get answers from the top Attorneys
Ask Question

70 Answers given in the last few hours.

86611 Active attorneys ready to answer your question

Search Past Answers:
  Advanced Search